Friday, 24 January 2014

Facebook To Start Running Ads In Mobile Apps, Building Foundation For Mobile Ad Network

Facebook announced january 22nd on its developer blog that it will begin running ads in third-party mobile apps, laying the foundation for what will likely become the site’s mobile ad network.
From the announcement:
We are running a small test to explore showing Facebook ads in third-party mobile apps. In this test, we’ll be extending Facebook’s rich targeting to improve the relevancy of the ads people see, provide even greater reach for Facebook advertisers, and help developers better monetize their apps.
Facebook says it’s working “directly” with a small number of advertisers and publishers, and is limiting this test run to a only a few partners.
While Facebook is not accepting any additional participants in its mobile ad program right now, the site has provided a sign-up form for anyone who wants updates on the program.

Samsung Galaxy S5: 7 Absolute Reasons Why You Need to Upgrade from Galaxy S4 or S3

Galaxy S4 begins ageing upon the official launch of Galaxy S5 on April, but the newest smartphone will come in such a steep price. Is the upgrade cost of up to €800 on the metallic Galaxy S5 worth leaving the Galaxy S4 or S3 this year?

Let's Talk About SpecsThe Galaxy S5 hardware specs are no joke compared to the close relation between the Galaxy S4 and S3 last year. For at least €800 or €650 (plastic), buyers will get a 5.25 inches of screen size, qHD 2,560 x 1,440 display resolution, Android 4.4 KitKat, 16 MP rear camera shooter, brand new Exynos 6 octa-core or Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 quad-core processor and other extras on the Galaxy S5.
Upgrading to the next-gen Galaxy S handset brings bigger screen, better display, improved RAM, no need to wait for Android 4.4 update, very well improve Exynos processor, much powerful camera than the current Galaxy S4 or S3 and new additional technologies.
Power Enhancements
Samsung adds 300 mAh to the battery of the Galaxy S4 and packs this on the Galaxy S5 which uses rapid charging. The battery of the S5 is made up of a special new type of Li-ion which stores 20 per cent more energy than the standard type in the market.
In addition, battery life is expected to last longer due to its new processor type that consumes 50 per cent less than the previous version and updated TouchWiz which holds an improved Power Saving tool. The Galaxy S4 or S3 may get these software improvements from the Android 4.4 update, but it is still better to get improvements right from the core.
Galaxy S Exclusives
Due to the new hardware technology of the Galaxy S5, expect great enhancements on Samsung exclusive apps and services. Fans of these apps can expect the Galaxy S5 to feature improved touch solutions with hovering detection, shortening the distance than previous versions on the Galaxy S4 and S3. The feature will be used by Air View.
Even if with an updated Android 4.4 KitKat-running Galaxy S4 or S3, users will not get the same snappiness and performance of these apps like that in the Galaxy S5.
New Added Security
The Galaxy S5 features a new security technology embedded right on the display. The fingerprint sensor scans a user's fingerprints on the screen instead of using the home key as what Apple did on the iPhone5S. This new tech isn't something the Galaxy S4 and S3 can replicate due to hardware limitations.
New UI, Themes and Icons
Those who love TouchWiz and already got bored with the current version on the Galaxy S4 or S3 may want to consider the magazine-style UI, new icons and new notifications on the Galaxy S5. Samsung decided to upgrade the "boring" design of TouchWiz from the previous Android version. The new UI is now available on Galaxy Note 12.2 and Galaxy Tab 10.1 Pro Editions.
Better One-Hand Operation
Since the Galaxy S5 boasts a bigger screen like the Galaxy Note, Samsung improved its one-hand operation mode. Users will be given the opportunity to choose which corner they want to use for this function that allows the use of one hand with all kinds of apps, notifications or calls.
Unlike the current one-hand operation on Galaxy Note devices, users may actually customise the one-hand function as if creating shortcuts on their favourite corner.
Android 4.4 KitKat is Installed
Obviously, Android 4.4 KitKat runs the Galaxy S5, but that's not the only point. The Galaxy S4 and S3 are still on Android 4.3 Jelly Bean which is currently plagued by major issues on several system functionalities, and users may have to wait until March for Android 4.4 KitKat.
The scary part is the possibility of another major setback that would not only delay the update but also bring a whole new bunch of problems like what happened with Android 4.3. For those who will get the Galaxy S5, there is no need to worry about buggy updates since it is the base software after all and definitely matches the hardware components.
The Galaxy S5 may be as expensive as the Galaxy S4 last year. However, this time, it is definitely carrying major upgrades on the Galaxy S line. Plus, it brags a metal version to go against Apple's iPhoneHTC One or Sony Xperia smartphones.

Thursday, 23 January 2014

Yahoo Search Goes Secure, Taking Referrer Data — An Indicator Of Yahoo’s Popularity — With It

By default, searches on Yahoo.com are now done through a secure server. That means more protection for searchers but less data for search marketers about how they are receiving traffic. Most visits from Yahoo done via search will appear as if someone came to a site directly. As a result, Yahoo’s apparent popularity as a traffic driving source will appear to plunge. Yahoo also has left a loophole to keep sending search data to advertisers.
Yahoo Makes Secure Search The Default is our story on Marketing Land with more details about the shift. In summary, it’s still rolling out and by March 31 of this year, all Yahoo search properties worldwide should be using secure search.
This article here on Search Engine Land will focus on the loss of referrer data and what that means for search marketers.

Google & Not Provided

Search marketers are long-used to the idea that they no longer get so much search term data because of Google’s move to secure search in October 2011 for signed-in users:
  • Google To Begin Encrypting Searches & Outbound Clicks By Default With SSL Search
That ushered in the era of “Dark Google” where search terms were withheld:
  • Dark Google: One Year Since Search Terms Went “Not Provided”
Then last September, Google confirmed that it was moving all searches to secure by default, not just those who were signed-in to Google:
  • Post-PRISM, Google Confirms Quietly Moving To Make All Searches Secure, Except For Ad Clicks
All of this has meant that the vast majority of searches done on Google, and which lead to a site, have the search terms removed or shown as “not provided” to those who make use of Google Analytics. Search marketers know a search happened on Google, but they don’t know what the exact term was.

Yahoo & No Referrers

So is Yahoo’s change going to cause a spike in “not provided.” No. That’s because Yahoo’s not sharing anything at all. In most cases, a search on Yahoo that leads to a publisher will reveal nothing — you won’t know the terms, nor will you even know the person came from Yahoo. It will seem as if they came directly to your site.
A similar thing happened with those making use of mobile Safari when searching on Google in 2012:
  • Mystery Solved: Why Mobile Safari Searchers Appear To Come “Direct” To Sites Rather Than Via Google
  • Mystery Solved: Why Mobile Safari Searchers Appear To Come “Direct” To Sites Rather Than Via Google

Data From Google But Not Yahoo?

How is it that Google secure search still lets you know someone came from Google but Yahoo secure search doesn’t? That’s because Google carefully constructed its secure search to actually make it less secure, to allow for general referrer information to pass (so you know an unnamed search happened on Google) and for actual search terms to pass for Google’s advertisers.
The stories below explain more about this in detail:
  • Google Puts A Price On Privacy
  • The Questions Google Refuses To Answer About Search Privacy
  • How Google could have made the Web secure and failed — again
Potentially, Yahoo could make a similar change. But for the moment, the company says it has no comment about the issue, as the rollout isn’t complete.
As a result, Yahoo will likely see its popularity plunge in the stats used by publishers. It will be sending search traffic but not be credited for this. Of course, Yahoo’s real popularity has already plunged so much that many publishers probably don’t even pay much attention to the amount of search traffic it sends. But what little it does send is now going to appear a lot worse.
By the way, when it comes to searches that lead to secure servers, Yahoo appears to be following standard protocol and passing along full-referrers. However, as most sites are not secure sites, most publishers won’t receive this information.
Postscript: Yahoo tells us that in the case of ad clicks, as with Google, referrer data and search terms will continue to be passed along to advertisers over the web and in the clear.

What’s Up With Bing

Bing launched secure search this month, also, but it’s not on by default, as with Google and Yahoo. That means it will have very little impact on data being withheld. But if it goes on by default, as currently configured, it would act just like Yahoo and pass no data at all. Our story below has more:
  • Bing Begins Supporting Separately SSL Search Site; No Referrers Pass

The Rundown

So how’s the landscape look on who passes what and when? Like this:
  • Yahoo: secure search is the default, no referrers passed, except for advertisers
  • Google: secure search is the default, Google referrer passed but search terms stripped, except for advertisers
  • Bing: secure search is optional, no referrers passed

Google’s Matt Cutts: We Don’t Use Twitter Or Facebook Social Signals To Rank Pages

Google’s head of search spam, Matt Cutts, released a video today answering the question, “are Facebook and Twitter signals part of the ranking algorithm?” The short answer was no.
Matt said that Google does not give any special treatment to Facebook or Twitter pages. They are in fact, currently, treated like any other page, according to Matt Cutts.
Matt then answered if Google does special crawling or indexing for these sites, such as indexing the number of likes or tweets a specific page has. Matt said Google does not do that right now. Why?
They have at one point and they were blocked. I believe Matt was referring to Google’s real time search deal expiring with Twitter. Matt explained that they put a lot of engineering time into it and then they were blocked and that work and effort was no longer useful. So for Google to put more engineering time into this and then be blocked again, it just doesn’t pay.
Another reason, Google is worried about crawling identity information at one point and then that information changes but Google doesn’t see the update until much later. Having outdated information can be harmful to some people.
However, Matt does add that he does see Google crawling, indexing and understanding more about identities on the web in the long term. He used our Danny Sullivan as an example, when Danny writes a story here, the site is authoritative, so it ranks well. But if Danny posts a comment on a forum or on Twitter, it would be useful for Google to know that an authority posted on a specific site and thus it should have more ranking weight in Google.
While Google doesn’t do this now, we know they are indeed working on a solution for this.
Here is the video:

Google Adds A Knowledge Graph Popup To Search Results, But Is It Good For Site Owners?

Google has announced the formal rollout of a test that some searchers have been seeing for a few days now — a test that associates a Knowledge Graph popup with certain web pages in desktop search results.
The popup adds more information about certain search results, which sounds like it should be good for searchers. But, as I’ll show below, the implementation may not be great for site owners.
“You’ll see this extra information when a site is widely recognized as notable online, when there is enough information to show or when the content may be handy for you,” wrote Google’s Bart Niechwiej in today’s blog post.
Since it’s Knowledge Graph data, the popups rely heavily on Wikipedia. In my searching, I didn’t see a single example that didn’t have data from Wikipedia.
The data provides background on the website listed in the search result, and it appears in a small popup window that’s accessible from a clickable link on the second line of the result. Here’s a sample that I noticed on a recent search: google-knowledge-graph-popup
In that example, each boxed area — “Wikipedia,” “Toronto Sun” and “Canoe.ca” is clickable and shows the Knowledge Graph popup.

Good News Or Bad News For Site Owners?

For site owners, this could be seen as a welcome addition because it adds extra information about the website and may encourage users to click the search result. There’s maybe also an element of accomplishment — i.e., “we’re important enough to get this special search result feature.”
On the other hand, as the screenshot above shows, the popup adds up to three extra links to the search result that don’t go to your website:
  • The avatar/logo links to the site’s Google+ page
  • The “Wikipedia” credit at the end of the text links to the Wikipedia page about the website
  • The “Owned by” text links to a Google search (in this case, for “Québecor Média”)
If this becomes a popular feature with searchers, it could lead some to click away from the actual web page that Google included in its search results.
In any case, Google says it expects to show more information about more websites as it expands the Knowledge Graph.

Monday, 20 January 2014

Announcing the Brand New Beginner's Guide to Social Media

Welcome to The Beginner's Guide to Social Media!

The prevalence and importance of social media to web marketing can't be overstated. To quote a few statistics from the guide itself, 72% of online adults use social networking sites, and YouTube now reaches more U.S. adults aged 18-34 than any cable network. With that kind of traffic, it's no wonder marketers now use these networks to interact with their customers, and there's plenty more data to prove it. Google searches for "social media" have seen a steady rise since early 2009:
Data from this year's industry survey tell a similar story. In 2012, nearly 20% of respondents reported not using any social media tools; this year, that number was down to 11%. On top of that, 63% of respondents indicated that their demand for social media marketing has increased over the last year. Whether you've been in on the game from the very beginning or are just starting to wonder how social tools can apply to your own professional life, this guide was created to help take you to the next level. Click below to dive in, or keep reading for more details!

What's inside

There's something for everyone in here, from the fundamentals of how social media is used to details about individual platforms and overarching best practices. Here's a list of the chapters you'll find in the guide:
The first section of the guide talks about social media in general, offering a plethora of best practices, a clear sense of the value of social media, ways you can measure your success in this endeavor, and recommendations on how to get started. From there, we dive into individual sites, slicing and dicing each of the major social media platforms and offering a consistent set of topics about each.
Here's a run-through of what you'll find:

Key stats and demographics

How many people are using these networks, and what kinds of people are they? When it comes to figuring out which social networks are right for you to use, it helps to know who you might be able to reach by developing a presence. This section is designed to give you the who, what, where, and when of each platform. You'll find infographics with statistics as well as some more general info.

How are people using the platform?

While the previous section covers who, what, where and when, this one covers the how and why of each platform. With uses ranging from establishing thought leadership to building customer advocates, this section (complete with innovative pro-tips) will give you a clearer picture of why you might want to choose one platform over another.

Strategies and tactics for success

Okay; you've decided to dive in. Success comes in different ways for different platforms, though, so how do you maximize your chances of seeing early results? This section is all about starting you in the right direction, making sure you can learn from the mistakes of everyone who came before you instead of from your own.

What success looks like

Many people learn better when they can see a great example of what they're going for, and while there's certainly no "best" way of going about your presence on any particular network, there's a great deal you can learn by examining some of the biggest success stories for each network. The sites listed in this section are all continuously finding new and innovative practices, so checking back in on them once in a while will help keep you up-to-date.

Etiquette tips and guidelines

At their hearts, all of these networks are really just tools to facilitate different kinds of social interactions. For that reason, there exists an unwritten code of etiquette for each. Most of this code mirrors basic human etiquette, but in new environments it's easy to make accidental slips. This section aims to point out some of the ways in which folks end up harming the trust and authority of their brands by ruffling their audiences' feathers, reducing the chances of any accidental train wrecks.

Recommended tools

While the platforms themselves are full of functionality, there are other tools on the web that can really take your social presence to the next level, offering you everything from scheduling functionality to insight and analytics not offered by the networks. For each of the major platforms, we list our favorite tools and talk about how they can help your efforts.


Why Guest Posting and Blogging is a Slippery Slope

While guest posting can be a wonderful way to build your authority and earn links, it takes a huge amount of effort, and it's easy for marketers to start slipping down the "Guest Posting Slope of Madness." One of Rand's predictions for marketing in 2014 is that Google will begin to crack down on low-quality guest posts, and in today's Whiteboard Friday, he clears up some of the misconceptions that can lead to a downhill slide.
8:17
 
 
 
 
 
  
For reference, here's a still of this week's whiteboard!

Video Transcription

Sarah: Howdy Moz fans. This is Sarah Bird, and I am the new CEO and that's why I am doing Whiteboard Friday. Today, we're going to talk about guest blog posting because that's SEO. Okay, so the first thing you have to do is think of something [Rand guides Sarah aside] ...
Sarah to Rand: But I'm the new CEO, and that means I do the ...
Rand: Howdy Moz fans, and welcome to another edition of Whiteboard Friday, which I will still be doing for, well for a very, very, very long time to come I hope. Today I wanted to tackle a tricky topic. I know it's going to be a controversial one because a lot of folks in the SEO space do a lot of guest posting and guest blogging, but there's a challenge here. So I made some predictions last week, a couple weeks ago now, in the new year about what 2014 will bring.
One of those is that I predicted that Google will be taking some webspam action, essentially the Webspam Team will be building an algorithm to target guest posters, people who do a lot of guest posting and a lot of guest blogging at scale to get links back to their site in order to rank. This is a very common strategy that many, many folks use, and here's why it's a slippery slope.
So oftentimes we start up, up here. You're sort of super white hat, and "Oh, yeah you know I've got some great stuff to share, but my site doesn't get all that much traffic so maybe I should go and see if Huffington Post or Mashable or maybe the Moz Blog or any of these sources will take it because I have a great post."
Hey, what do you know? A lot of the time if you have something relevant and useful and great to say and you have some great ideas to share, some great visuals, some data, fantastic. You can get those guest posts on those big sites. Then you start to slide down the slope a little. You think, "Oh, yeah, that Huff Post piece went really well, and hey, I got a link. I got a live link out of it. Maybe that link will help me rank a little better, boost my authority, and I don't know, that's kind of nice. I should do some more guest posts and get more links. Maybe I'll find some sites that can send me some traffic and boost my profile and authority out in the sphere and get a few more links."
This is still totally, pretty much fine, pretty much okay. But then you slide down this little slope. There's this devious little part right here, between the I'm doing this for kind of authority boosting and traffic sending reasons and I'm just doing this for the link.
So you slide down the slope, and then you get, "Oh, man, finding decent sites that will take my guests posts is really hard, and I keep having to write really good stuff and come up with new ideas because they all want unique content. You know what? Maybe I'll just start going to any places that I can go where I'll get a link. Then eventually you slide down into this sort of total black hat territory where you are, "You know, I bet I could scale this and even automate it. I'm going to use a team of outsourced writers, and I'm going to use a team of outsourced placement specialists. I'm going to write some little thing to scrape through the links I download from OSC from my competitors and scrape through the Google results and find any place that'll take a guest post, who've taken five or more with spammy anchor text before, because that's what I want."
Oh, brother. That's why I call this the guest posting slope of madness. Madness! It is madness, because think about what happens here. Essentially you're going down this slope, and maybe you're seeing results, more and more results, but you don't know whether these links and these links that you've slid down into are actually really helping you or whether the authority and the profile that you've built from these good ones and all the other good marketing activities and the things your product is doing and your brand is doing are helping you, and you might think these are. So you keep doing them and then bam! You get smacked by a Penguin or the guest posting algo or whatever it is that comes next, and you have to go and try and get these folks to remove all these links, you have to disavow them, you've got to send your reconsideration requests, you're out of the search results for weeks or months at a time, usually months, sometimes years.
What have you done to your site? What have you done to your SEO? What if you had taken all this effort and energy and put it into just doing this stuff and then once you built up this authority doing most of the posting on your own site where people would be linking to you?
One of the frustrating things about guest posting that people forget all the time is that when you are putting content somewhere else, especially if that's good content, especially if it's stuff that's really earning traffic and visibility, that means all the links are going to somebody else's site. Somebody else is earning most of the attention awareness, and granted some of that is transferring on to you and that's why we do guest posting. But you have to be aware of that, and that leads me into some flawed assumptions.
Flawed assumption number one: More links are always better. This is not the case. This is not the case. I have seen many, many sites with just a few, a handful, a few dozen to a few hundred great links far outranking their brethren with thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of links. All links are not created equal.
Less editorial restriction is better. When you're guest posting you're like, "Oh, they're so picky, these editors. Man, they want me to jump through all these hoops. Let me find some place that'll just take whatever I'll throw them." Guess what? If they take whatever you're throwing them, they're taking whatever the rest of the Internet is throwing them, and we all know what the rest of the Internet looks like.
Number three: The link matters more than other factors, other factors like traffic and influence and credibility. Also not the case. I'll be totally honest. I will take a great guest post that refuses to link to me or that only no follow links to me if I know that 5,000 or 10,000 people are going to read that piece and a few hundred people are going to re-tweet it and a few hundred people are going to like it on Facebook, because that is boosting my influence and my authority, and that is creating all kinds of things that will have second order effects that impact my SEO and my broad web marketing far better than just a link.
When should you guest post and blog? Well, like I said, if you're trying to reach that new audience, that new audience that another site or page or blog has captured, great. Guest posting is a wonderful choice. For example, let's say here at Moz we're trying to reach into the design community. We might go to some wonderful web design sites, Smashing Magazine, for example, and say, "Hey. Would you guys want maybe a good resource on SEO for designers?" They might say, "Yeah, great we'd love you." Perfect. That's a perfect marriage there.
In addition to creating a relationship with another organization through content, I also love this. This is a great way to build some early stages of relationship with another company before you do a formal partnership, and it helps to see whether there's kind of an overlap between your two organizations' audiences, such that you might want to do a deeper kind of relationship, maybe a sponsorship or an investment together, project or product together.
Quick note here. For your marquee content, your best stuff, I strongly -- see how I've underlined strongly -- strongly suggest using your own site. Reason being, if you're going to put wonderful stuff out there, even if you think it could do better on somebody else's site, in the long term you want that to live on your own site.
The last note I'll make is that Google's Webspam Team has been telegraphing for nearly a year that they are coming after sites that are using guest posting tactics at scale. You've heard comments from Google's Head of Webspam, that's Matt Cutts. You've seen comments on the Google Webmaster blog. You've heard them talk about it at conferences. If you're not getting the message, they are sending it directly to all of the folks in the SEO world that guest posting and guest blogging are targets for webspam in the future.
So just be very, very careful please and stay up and don't fall down this slippery slope. All right everyone, thanks so much. Take care.